Morphology rather than environment drives the SFR-Mass relation in the local universe
R. Calvi, B. Vulcani, B. M. Poggianti, A. Moretti, J. Fritz, G. Fasano

TL;DR
This study shows that in the local universe, galaxy morphology and local interactions primarily influence the star formation rate-stellar mass relation more than the large-scale environment.
Contribution
It provides a detailed analysis of how galaxy morphology and various environmental factors affect the SFR-M_star relation in the local universe, highlighting the dominant role of morphology.
Findings
SFR-M_star relation is environment-independent above certain mass and SSFR thresholds.
Galaxies in less dense environments have higher SFR at fixed mass.
Morphological type strongly influences SFR and SSFR at fixed stellar mass.
Abstract
Exploiting a sample of 680 star-forming galaxies from the Padova-Millennium GalaxyGroup Catalog (PM2GC) (Calvi et al. 2011) in the range 0.038<z<0.104, we present a detailed analysis of the Star Formation Rate (SFR)-stellar mass (M_star) and specific SFR(SSFR)-M_star relations as a function of environment. We adopt three different parameterizations of environment, to probe different scales. We consider separately 1) galaxies in groups, binary and single systems, defined in terms of a Friends-of-Friends algorithm, 2) galaxies located at different projected local densities, 3) galaxies in haloes of different mass. Overall, above logM_ast/M_sun>10.25 and SSFR>10^{-12} yr^{-1}, the SFR-M_ast and SSFR-M_ast relations do not depend on environment, when the global environment is used, while when the halo mass is considered, high mass haloes might have a systematically lower (S)SFR-M_ast…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
