Coronal hard X-ray sources revisited
Brian R. Dennis, Miguel A. Duval-Poo, Michele Piana, Andrew R. Inglis,, A. Gordon Emslie, Jingnan Guo, Yan Xu

TL;DR
This study re-analyzed solar flare hard X-ray sources, finding no evidence of increasing source length with energy, but confirmed that the coronal HXR source peaks rise with energy, supporting models of magnetic reconnection.
Contribution
It provides a revised analysis showing that coronal HXR source length does not increase with energy, challenging previous findings and refining flare models.
Findings
Coronal HXR source length does not increase with energy.
Peak altitude of coronal HXR sources increases with energy.
Supports standard flare model with higher altitude hot loops.
Abstract
This paper reports on the re-analysis of solar flares in which the hard X-rays (HXRs) come predominantly from the corona rather than from the more usual chromospheric footpoints. All of the 26 previously analyzed event time intervals, over 13 flares, are re-examined for consistency with a flare model in which electrons are accelerated near the top of a magnetic loop that has a sufficiently high density to stop most of the electrons by Coulomb collisions before they can reach the footpoints. Of particular importance in the previous analysis was the finding that the length of the coronal HXR source increased with energy in the 20 - 30 keV range. However, after allowing for the possibility that footpoint emission at the higher energies affects the inferred length of the coronal HXR source, and using analysis techniques that suppress the possible influence of such footpoint emission, we…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
