The SFR-M$_*$ Correlation Extends to Low Mass at High Redshift
Kartheik G. Iyer, Eric Gawiser, Romeel Dav\'e, Philip Davis, Steven L., Finkelstein, Dritan Kodra, Anton M. Koekemoer, Peter Kurczynski, Jeffery A., Newman, Camilla Pacifici, and Rachel Somerville

TL;DR
This study extends the analysis of the star formation rate-stellar mass correlation to low-mass galaxies at high redshift using reconstructed star formation histories, revealing a consistent linear relation down to M*~10^7 M_sun and its evolution over cosmic time.
Contribution
The paper introduces a novel method using reconstructed SFHs to probe the SFR-M* correlation at high redshift and low masses, surpassing previous observational limits.
Findings
The SFR-M* correlation remains linear down to M*~10^7 M_sun at z>4.
The correlation's evolution is quantitatively described by a specific redshift-dependent formula.
The method is validated with simulations, confirming its sensitivity to the correlation's parameters.
Abstract
To achieve a fuller understanding of galaxy evolution, SED fitting can be used to recover quantities beyond stellar masses (M) and star formation rates (SFRs). We use Star Formation Histories (SFHs) reconstructed via the Dense Basis method of Iyer \& Gawiser (2017) for a sample of galaxies at in the CANDELS GOODS-S field to study the nature and evolution of the SFR-M correlation. The reconstructed SFHs represent trajectories in SFR-M space, enabling us to study galaxies at epochs earlier than observed by propagating them backwards in time along these trajectories. We study the SFR-M correlation at using both direct fits to galaxies observed at those epochs and SFR-M trajectories of galaxies observed at lower redshifts. The SFR-M correlations obtained using the two approaches are found to be consistent with each other through a…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
