A Fixed-Depth Size-Hierarchy Theorem for AC$^0[\oplus]$ via the Coin Problem

TL;DR

This paper establishes a hierarchy within AC$^0[igoplus]$ circuits using the $ ext{Coin}$ problem, providing explicit functions with matching upper and lower bounds, and advancing understanding of circuit complexity at fixed depths.

Contribution

It proves a fixed-depth size-hierarchy theorem for AC$^0[igoplus]$, introduces explicit functions for bounds, and advances the complexity analysis of the $ ext{Coin}$ problem.

Findings

Established the first fixed-depth size-hierarchy for AC$^0[igoplus]$.

Derived explicit functions with matching bounds for the $ ext{Coin}$ problem.

Improved lower bounds for AC$^0[igoplus]$ formulas solving the $ ext{Coin}$ problem.

Abstract

We prove the first Fixed-depth Size-hierarchy Theorem for uniform AC$^0[\oplus]$ circuits; in particular, for fixed $d$, the class $\mathcal{C}_{d,k}$ of uniform AC$^0[\oplus]$ formulas of depth $d$ and size $n^k$ form an infinite hierarchy. For this, we find the first class of explicit functions giving (up to polynomial factor) matching upper and lower bounds for AC$^0[\oplus]$ formulas, derived from the $\delta$-Coin Problem, the computational problem of distinguishing between coins that are heads with probability $(1+\delta)/2$ or $(1-\delta)/2,$ where $\delta$ is a parameter going to $0$. We study this problem's complexity and make progress on both upper bounds and lower bounds. Upper bounds. We find explicit monotone AC$^0$ formulas solving the $\delta$-coin problem, having depth $d$, size $\exp(O(d(1/\delta)^{1/(d-1)}))$, and sample complexity poly$(1/\delta)$, for constant $d\ge2$. This matches previous upper bounds of O'Donnell and Wimmer (ICALP 2007) and Amano (ICALP 2009) in terms of size and improves the sample complexity. Lower bounds. The upper bounds are nearly tight even for the stronger model of AC$^0[\oplus]$ formulas (which allow NOT and Parity gates): any AC$^0[\oplus]$ formula solving the $\delta$-coin problem must have size $\exp(\Omega(d(1/\delta)^{1/(d-1)})).$ This strengthens a result of Cohen, Ganor and Raz (APPROX-RANDOM 2014), who prove a similar result for AC$^0$, and a result of Shaltiel and Viola (SICOMP 2010), who give a superpolynomially weaker (still exponential) lower bound. The upper bound is a derandomization involving a use of Janson's inequality (as far as we know, the first such use of the inequality) and classical combinatorial designs. For the lower bound, we prove an optimal (up to constant factor) degree lower bound for multivariate polynomials over $\mathbb{F}_2$ solving the $\delta$-coin problem, which may be of independent interest.