Modelling the mass-metallicity relation of star-forming galaxies from z ~ 3.5 to z ~ 0
Jianhui Lian (ICG, Portsmouth), Daniel Thomas (ICG, Portsmouth),, Claudia Maraston (ICG, Portsmouth)

TL;DR
This paper presents a numerical chemical evolution model explaining the cosmic evolution of the mass-metallicity relation in star-forming galaxies from redshift 3.5 to 0, incorporating time-dependent outflows or IMF variations.
Contribution
It introduces a model that successfully reproduces the observed two-phase evolution of the MZR and its relation to galaxy star formation, considering variable outflows or IMF slopes.
Findings
The MZR exhibits a transition around z ~ 1.5, with a flattening trend afterward.
Both variable metal outflow and IMF models fit the observed MZR evolution well.
The model aligns with the evolution of the galaxy main sequence.
Abstract
We study the origin and cosmic evolution of the mass-metallicity relation (MZR) in star-forming galaxies based on a full, numerical chemical evolution model. The model was designed to match the local MZRs for both gas and stars simultaneously. This is achieved by invoking a time-dependent metal enrichment process which assumes either a time-dependent metal outflow with larger metal loading factors in galactic winds at early times, or a time-dependent Initial Mass Function (IMF) with steeper slopes at early times. We compare the predictions from this model with data sets covering redshifts 0<z<3.5. The data suggests a two-phase evolution with a transition point around z ~ 1.5. Before that epoch the MZRgas has been evolving parallel with no evolution in the slope. After z ~ 1.5 the MZRgas started flattening until today. We show that the predictions of both the variable metal outflow and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
