The $^{16}$O/$^{18}$O ratio in Water in the Coma of Comet 67P / Churyumov-Gerasimenko measured with the Rosetta / ROSINA Double-Focusing Mass Spectrometer
Isaac R.H.G. Schroeder I, Kathrin Altwegg, Hans Balsiger, Jean-Jacques, Berthelier, Johan De Keyser, Bj\"orn Fiethe, Stephen A. Fuselier, S\'ebastien, Gasc, Tamas I. Gombosi, Martin Rubin, Thierry S\'emon, Chia-Yu Tzou, Susanne, F. Wampfler, and Peter Wurz

TL;DR
This study measures the oxygen isotope ratio in water from comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko using Rosetta's mass spectrometer, revealing an enrichment of $^{18}$O that supports the idea of primordial cometary water.
Contribution
First in-situ measurement of $^{16}$O/$^{18}$O ratio in cometary water, confirming models of primordial water enrichment in comets.
Findings
$^{16}$O/$^{18}$O ratio is 445 ± 35, indicating 11% enrichment.
Results support models of primordial water formation with 5-20% enrichment.
Consistent with the comet containing ancient, unaltered water.
Abstract
The European Space Agency (ESA) spacecraft Rosetta accompanied the Jupiter-family comet (JFC) 67P / Churyumov-Gerasimenko for over two years along its trajectory through the inner solar system. Between 2014 and 2016, it performed almost continuous in-situ measurements of the comet's gaseous atmosphere in close proximity to its nucleus. In this study, the O/O ratio of HO in the coma of 67P / Churyumov-Gerasimenko, as measured by the ROSINA DFMS mass spectrometer on board Rosetta, was determined from the ratio of HO / HO and OH / OH. The value of 445 35 represents an 11% enrichment of O compared with the terrestrial ratio of 498.7 0.1. This cometary value is consistent with the comet containing primordial water, in accordance with leading self-shielding models. These models predict primordial water to be…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
