Testing strong line metallicity diagnostics at z~2
V. Patr\'icio, L. Christensen, H. Rhodin, R. Ca\~nameras, M. A., Lara-L\'opez

TL;DR
This study evaluates the reliability of common strong line metallicity diagnostics at z~2, finding that local calibrations remain valid within certain metallicity ranges despite some dispersion and biases.
Contribution
It provides a comparative analysis of multiple strong line diagnostics at high redshift using robust oxygen auroral line measurements, highlighting their relative accuracies and limitations.
Findings
R23 and O3 diagnostics perform best with 0.01-0.04 dex accuracy.
Nitrogen-involving ratios tend to overestimate metallicity.
Theoretical calibration achieves comparable accuracy to empirical methods.
Abstract
High-z galaxy gas-phase metallicities are usually determined through observations of strong optical emission lines with calibrations tied to the local universe. Recent debate has questioned if these calibrations are valid in the high-z universe. We investigate this by analysing a sample of 16 galaxies at z~2 available in the literature, and for which the metallicity can be robustly determined using oxygen auroral lines. The sample spans a redshift range of 1.4 < z < 3.6, has metallicities of 7.4-8.4 in 12+log(O/H) and stellar masses 10^7.5-10^11 Msun. We test commonly used strong line diagnostics (R23, O3, O2, O32, N2, O3N2 and Ne3O2 ) as prescribed by four different sets of empirical calibrations, as well as one fully theoretical calibration. We find that none of the strong line diagnostics (or calibration set) tested perform consistently better than the others. Amongst the line ratios…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
