Experimentally well-constrained masses of $^{27}$P and $^{27}$S: Implications for studies of explosive binary systems
L. J. Sun, X. X. Xu, S. Q. Hou, C. J. Lin, J. Jos\'e, J. Lee, J. J., He, Z. H. Li, J. S. Wang, C. X. Yuan, F. Herwig, J. Keegans, T. Budner, D. X., Wang, H. Y. Wu, P. F. Liang, Y. Y. Yang, Y. H. Lam, P. Ma, F. F. Duan, Z. H., Gao, Q. Hu, Z. Bai, J. B. Ma, J. G. Wang, F. P. Zhong

TL;DR
This study provides the most precise measurements of the masses of $^{27}$P and $^{27}$S, refining reaction rates and assessing their impact on astrophysical explosive phenomena like X-ray bursts and novae.
Contribution
The paper presents the first precise mass measurements of $^{27}$P and constrains the mass of $^{27}$S, significantly improving reaction rate estimates used in astrophysical models.
Findings
$^{27}$P mass is $-659(9)$ keV, 2.3$\sigma$ higher than previous estimates.
$^{27}$S$ mass excess is constrained to 17678(77) keV.
The $^{26}$Si$(p, ext{γ})^{27}$P reaction rate is significantly lower at certain temperatures.
Abstract
The mass of P was predicted to impact the X-ray burst (XRB) model predictions of burst light curves and the composition of the burst ashes. To address the uncertainties and inconsistencies in the reported P masses in literature, a wealth of information has been extracted from the -decay spectroscopy of the drip-line nucleus S. We determine the most precise mass excess of P to date to be ~keV, which is 63~keV (2.3) higher than the AME2016 recommended value of ~keV. The experimentally unknown mass excess of S was estimated to be 17030(400)~keV in AME2016, and we constrain this mass to be 17678(77)~keV based on the measured -delayed two-proton energy. In the temperature region of ~GK, the SiP reaction rate determined in this work is significantly lower than the rate recommended…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
