Where is the engine hiding its missing energy? Constraints from a deep X-ray non-detection of the Superluminous SN 2015bn
Kornpob Bhirombhakdi, Ryan Chornock, Raffaella Margutti, Matt Nicholl,, Brian D. Metzger, Edo Berger, Ben Margalit, Dan Milisavljevic

TL;DR
Deep X-ray observations of SN 2015bn reveal a significant missing energy problem in superluminous supernovae, constraining models of magnetar engines and high-energy emission leakage.
Contribution
This study provides the deepest X-ray limit at 805 days post-explosion, constraining energy leakage and ruling out certain high-energy emission scenarios in SLSNe-I.
Findings
X-ray luminosity limit < 10^41 erg/s at 805 days
Less than 1.5% of magnetar input luminosity detected in X-rays
Constraints on models including magnetar leakage, shock interaction, and gamma-ray bursts
Abstract
SN 2015bn is a nearby hydrogen-poor superluminous supernova (SLSN-I) that has been intensively observed in X-rays with the goal to detect the spin-down powered emission from a magnetar engine. The early-time UV/optical/infrared (UVOIR) data fit well to the magnetar model, but require leakage of energy at late times of erg s, which is expected to be partially emitted in X-rays. Deep X-ray limits until 300 days after explosion revealed no X-ray emission. Here, we present the latest deep 0.3--10 keV X-ray limit at 805 days obtained with \textit{XMM-Newton}. We find erg s, with no direct evidence for central-engine powered emission. While the late-time optical data still follow the prediction of the magnetar model, the best-fit model to the bolometric light curve predicts that 97\% of the total input luminosity of the magnetar is…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
