One thousand days of SN 2015bn: HST imaging shows a light curve flattening consistent with magnetar predictions
Matt Nicholl, Peter K. Blanchard, Edo Berger, Kate D. Alexander, Brian, D. Metzger, Kornpob Bhirombhakdi, Ryan Chornock, Deanne L. Coppejans,, Sebastian Gomez, Ben Margalit, Raffaella Margutti, Giacomo Terreran

TL;DR
This study presents late-time HST observations of superluminous supernova SN 2015bn, revealing a slow light curve decline consistent with magnetar spin-down models and constraining the supernova's physical properties.
Contribution
First late-time observations of SN 2015bn at over 1000 days, providing evidence supporting magnetar-powered models and constraining the supernova's environment and energy leakage.
Findings
Light curve decline rate of 0.19 mag per 100 days after 700 days
Optical spectra show no new features, indicating no strong circumstellar interaction
Constraints on magnetar radiation opacity and spectral energy distribution
Abstract
We present the first observations of a Type I superluminous supernova (SLSN) at days after maximum light. We observed SN 2015bn using the Hubble Space Telescope Advanced Camera for Surveys in the F475W, F625W and F775W filters at 721 days and 1068 days. SN 2015bn is clearly detected and resolved from its compact host, allowing reliable photometry. A galaxy template constructed from these data further enables us to isolate the SLSN flux in deep ground-based imaging. We measure a light curve decline rate at days of mag (100 d), much shallower than the earlier evolution, and slower than previous SLSNe (at any phase) or the decay rate of Co. Neither additional radioactive isotopes nor a light echo can consistently account for the slow decline. A spectrum at 1083 days shows the same [O I] and [Ca II] lines as seen at days,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
