Comments on "Schwinger's Model of Angular Momentum with GUP" by H. Verma et al, arXiv:1808.00766

TL;DR

This paper critiques a previous study on angular momentum with GUP, demonstrating methodological flaws and reaffirming the validity of earlier conclusions by Bosso and Das.

Contribution

It provides a critical analysis showing the flaws in the methodology and conclusions of the referenced paper, reaffirming earlier results on GUP and angular momentum.

Findings

The methodology of the criticized paper is flawed.

The conclusions of Bosso and Das remain valid.

The paper clarifies the correct approach to GUP and angular momentum.

Abstract

In this note, we show that the methodology and conclusions of "Schwinger's Model of Angular Momentum with GUP" [arxiv:1808.00766] are flawed and that the conclusions of "Generalized Uncertainty Principle and angular momentum" (P. Bosso and S. Das) [arxiv:1607.01083] remain valid.