Evaluation and comparison of MODIS Collection 6.1 aerosol optical depth against AERONET over regions in China with multifarious underlying surfaces
Yuan Wang, Qiangqiang Yuan, Tongwen Li, Huanfeng Shen, Li Zheng,, Liangpei Zhang

TL;DR
This study evaluates MODIS Collection 6.1 aerosol optical depth products over China, comparing them with AERONET data, and analyzes their performance across different land covers and regions to improve aerosol monitoring accuracy.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive assessment of MODIS C6.1 AOD retrievals against AERONET, highlighting improvements and regional differences in data quality and coverage.
Findings
C6.1 AOD retrievals show high correlation with AERONET (R=0.946).
DB retrievals outperform DT in urban areas, while DT is better in low-elevation regions.
C6.1 reduces overestimation of DT over urban areas compared to C6.
Abstract
In this study, we evaluated the performance of the MODIS C6.1 AOD products and compared them with the C6 products over regions in China with multifarious underlying surfaces during 2001 to 2016. The AOD retrievals were validated against 20 AERONET sites, and the results show that the R for DT retrievals in C6.1 is 0.946, while the fraction within the EE can be considered relatively low at only 54.03%. DB retrievals in C6.1 have a slightly lower R value, but the other criteria are superior to DT. Comparing the results over urban and vegetation areas in C6.1, the overall quality of the DB retrievals is better than the DT retrievals in urban areas. The performance of DT is significantly superior to DB in the LEV areas. For the HEV areas, DB performs synthetically better than DT. In the spatial distribution aspect in C6.1, most of the DB AOD values are less than those of DT, and the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
