Quantum algorithms and approximating polynomials for composed functions with shared inputs

TL;DR

This paper introduces new quantum algorithms and approximation techniques for evaluating composed Boolean functions with shared inputs, leading to nearly optimal bounds and implications for learning and circuit complexity.

Contribution

It provides tight quantum query and approximate degree bounds for composed functions, improving previous bounds and enabling subexponential learning algorithms for certain circuits.

Findings

Quantum algorithms with $ ilde{O}(\sqrt{Q(f) imes n})$ queries for composed functions.

Nearly optimal bounds on quantum query complexity and approximate degree of depth-$d$ AC$^0$ circuits.

Stronger size lower bounds for AC$^0 igcirc igoplus$ circuits computing Inner Product.

Abstract

We give new quantum algorithms for evaluating composed functions whose inputs may be shared between bottom-level gates. Let $f$ be an $m$-bit Boolean function and consider an $n$-bit function $F$ obtained by applying $f$ to conjunctions of possibly overlapping subsets of $n$ variables. If $f$ has quantum query complexity $Q(f)$, we give an algorithm for evaluating $F$ using $\tilde{O}(\sqrt{Q(f) \cdot n})$ quantum queries. This improves on the bound of $O(Q(f) \cdot \sqrt{n})$ that follows by treating each conjunction independently, and our bound is tight for worst-case choices of $f$. Using completely different techniques, we prove a similar tight composition theorem for the approximate degree of $f$. By recursively applying our composition theorems, we obtain a nearly optimal $\tilde{O}(n^{1-2^{-d}})$ upper bound on the quantum query complexity and approximate degree of linear-size depth-$d$ AC$^0$ circuits. As a consequence, such circuits can be PAC learned in subexponential time, even in the challenging agnostic setting. Prior to our work, a subexponential-time algorithm was not known even for linear-size depth-3 AC$^0$ circuits. As an additional consequence, we show that AC$^0 \circ \oplus$ circuits of depth $d+1$ require size $\tilde{\Omega}(n^{1/(1- 2^{-d})}) \geq \omega(n^{1+ 2^{-d}} )$ to compute the Inner Product function even on average. The previous best size lower bound was $\Omega(n^{1+4^{-(d+1)}})$ and only held in the worst case (Cheraghchi et al., JCSS 2018).