TL;DR
This paper benchmarks various Divergent-Component-of-Motion (DCM) based control architectures for humanoid robot walking, comparing their effectiveness in achieving stable, velocity-controlled locomotion on the iCub robot.
Contribution
It introduces and compares multiple DCM-based control architectures across three layers, including trajectory optimization, simplified control, and whole-body QP control, for humanoid walking.
Findings
Achieved walking velocity of 0.41 m/s on iCub.
Compared different DCM-based controllers for velocity and position control.
Identified effective control architectures for humanoid locomotion.
Abstract
This paper contributes towards the development and comparison of Divergent-Component-of-Motion (DCM) based control architectures for humanoid robot locomotion. More precisely, we present and compare several DCM based implementations of a three layer control architecture. From top to bottom, these three layers are here called: trajectory optimization, simplified model control, and whole-body QP control. All layers use the DCM concept to generate references for the layer below. For the simplified model control layer, we present and compare both instantaneous and Receding Horizon Control controllers. For the whole-body QP control layer, we present and compare controllers for position and velocity control robots. Experimental results are carried out on the one-meter tall iCub humanoid robot. We show which implementation of the above control architecture allows the robot to achieve a walking…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
