Combined collider constraints on neutralinos and charginos
The GAMBIT Collaboration: Peter Athron, Csaba Bal\'azs, Andy Buckley,, Jonathan M. Cornell, Matthias Danninger, Ben Farmer, Andrew Fowlie, Tom\'as, E. Gonzalo, Julia Harz, Paul Jackson, Rose Kudzman-Blais, Anders Kvellestad,, Gregory D. Martinez, Andreas Petridis, Are Raklev

TL;DR
This paper performs a detailed likelihood analysis of electroweakinos in the MSSM using recent LHC data, revealing a potential signal with a combined significance of up to 3.3 sigma and discussing implications for dark matter.
Contribution
It introduces a comprehensive likelihood analysis of neutralino and chargino constraints incorporating recent LHC, LEP, and Higgs decay data, highlighting a possible signal in electroweakino sector.
Findings
Current LHC searches do not exclude any neutralino or chargino mass ranges.
A possible excess indicates neutralino masses of 8-155 GeV and chargino masses of 104-259 GeV.
The excess has a local significance of 3.3 sigma, reduced to 2.9 sigma when including 8 TeV data.
Abstract
Searches for supersymmetric electroweakinos have entered a crucial phase, as the integrated luminosity of the Large Hadron Collider is now high enough to compensate for their weak production cross-sections. Working in a framework where the neutralinos and charginos are the only light sparticles in the Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model, we use gambit to perform a detailed likelihood analysis of the electroweakino sector. We focus on the impacts of recent ATLAS and CMS searches with 36 fb of 13 TeV proton-proton collision data. We also include constraints from LEP and invisible decays of the and Higgs bosons. Under the background-only hypothesis, we show that current LHC searches do not robustly exclude any range of neutralino or chargino masses. However, a pattern of excesses in several LHC analyses points towards a possible signal, with neutralino masses of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
