Evaluation Measures for Quantification: An Axiomatic Approach
Fabrizio Sebastiani

TL;DR
This paper proposes an axiomatic framework for evaluation measures in quantification, analyzing their properties, and highlighting the need for developing more suitable measures as current ones are insufficient.
Contribution
It introduces desirable properties for evaluation measures in quantification, surveys existing measures, and identifies gaps, emphasizing the need for improved evaluation metrics.
Findings
Some existing EMQs are severely unfit for proper quantification evaluation.
No current EMQ satisfies all desirable properties identified.
The study highlights the need for developing new or improved EMQs.
Abstract
Quantification is the task of estimating, given a set of unlabelled items and a set of classes , the prevalence (or `relative frequency') in of each class . While quantification may in principle be solved by classifying each item in and counting how many such items have been labelled with , it has long been shown that this `classify and count' (CC) method yields suboptimal quantification accuracy. As a result, quantification is no longer considered a mere byproduct of classification, and has evolved as a task of its own. While the scientific community has devoted a lot of attention to devising more accurate quantification methods, it has not devoted much to discussing what properties an \emph{evaluation measure for quantification} (EMQ) should enjoy, and which EMQs should be adopted…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
