An unexpected connection between Bayes $A-$optimal designs and the Group Lasso
Guillaume Sagnol, Edouard Pauwels

TL;DR
This paper reveals a novel connection between $A$-optimal design problems and group lasso regularization, enabling new scalable algorithms with proven convergence for large-scale experimental design tasks.
Contribution
It establishes an equivalence between $A$-optimal design and a regularized matrix optimization problem, leading to innovative algorithms with convergence guarantees.
Findings
Algorithms outperform existing methods on synthetic benchmarks.
Proposed methods have rigorous convergence guarantees.
Effective for large-scale $A$-optimal design problems.
Abstract
We show that the -optimal design optimization problem over design points in is equivalent to minimizing a quadratic function plus a group lasso sparsity inducing term over real matrices. This observation allows to describe several new algorithms for -optimal design based on splitting and block coordinate decomposition. These techniques are well known and proved powerful to treat large scale problems in machine learning and signal processing communities. The proposed algorithms come with rigorous convergence guaranties and convergence rate estimate stemming from the optimization literature. Performances are illustrated on synthetic benchmarks and compared to existing methods for solving the optimal design problem.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsStatistical Methods and Inference · Optimal Experimental Design Methods · Advanced Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms
