To the rescue of Copenhagen interpretation
Igor Salom

TL;DR
This paper critically examines recent claims challenging the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics, proposing novel perspectives that preserve its validity and clarifying misconceptions about Wigner's friend thought experiment.
Contribution
It introduces a new interpretation where Wigner's friend perceives no outcomes, addressing the controversy and defending the Copenhagen interpretation against recent critiques.
Findings
The Copenhagen interpretation remains consistent when considering subjective perceptions.
Wigner's friend might perceive no outcomes in the thought experiment.
Real experiments on Wigner's friend would not yield new insights into quantum mechanics.
Abstract
A recent paper "Single-world interpretations of quantum theory cannot be self-consistent" [arXiv:1604.07422] by D. Frauchiger and R. Renner has attracted a considerable interest of a broader physics audience and shortly elicited a number of replies. In spite of the objections that ensued, we find that significant part of the controversial initial claim has not been refuted - on the contrary, arguments presented both in the initial paper and in the replies seem to leave no longer room for the basic Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics. We revisit the controversy trying to pinpoint the exact phenomenon that lies in its core, pointing out to some aspects of the problem that seem to have been mostly overlooked. Taking all conclusions into account, we here propose novel ways to approach the ostensible paradox, in which the Copenhagen interpretation is naturally preserved. Whereas…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum Mechanics and Applications
