
TL;DR
This paper proposes a new perspective on quantum mechanics that clarifies its conceptual foundations by challenging implicit assumptions, aiming to unify understanding and address longstanding philosophical puzzles in physics.
Contribution
It introduces a novel interpretation of quantum mechanics that explicitly rejects common misconceptions, providing a clearer conceptual framework and extending the approach to classical physics puzzles.
Findings
Clarifies the conceptual basis of quantum mechanics
Unifies diverse interpretations and remarks by rejecting implicit assumptions
Addresses the meaning of 'Now' in classical physics
Abstract
We still lack any consensus about what one is actually talking about as one uses quantum mechanics. There is a gap between the abstract terms in which the theory is couched and the phenomena the theory enables each of us to account for so well. Because it has no practical consequences for how we each use quantum mechanics to deal with physical problems, this cognitive dissonance has managed to coexist with the quantum theory from the very beginning. The absence of conceptual clarity for almost a century suggests that the problem might lie in some implicit misconceptions about the nature of scientific explanation that are deeply held by virtually all physicists, but are rarely explicitly acknowledged. I describe here such unvoiced but widely shared assumptions. Rejecting them clarifies and unifies a range of obscure remarks about quantum mechanics made almost from the beginning by some…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
