Towards quantitative methods to assess network generative models
Vahid Mostofi, Sadegh Aliakbary

TL;DR
This paper proposes a novel method for evaluating network generative models by using graph classifiers to measure how well synthetic graphs resemble real networks in topological features.
Contribution
It introduces a new assessment approach that leverages graph classifiers to quantify the similarity between real and generated graphs, providing a performance metric for generative models.
Findings
Graph classifiers can effectively distinguish real from synthetic graphs.
The proposed method offers a quantitative measure of generative model quality.
This approach facilitates comparison of different network generative models.
Abstract
Assessing generative models is not an easy task. Generative models should synthesize graphs which are not replicates of real networks but show topological features similar to real graphs. We introduce an approach for assessing graph generative models using graph classifiers. The inability of an established graph classifier for distinguishing real and synthesized graphs could be considered as a performance measurement for graph generators.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGraph Theory and Algorithms · Complex Network Analysis Techniques · Data Visualization and Analytics
