The first 48: Discovery and progenitor constraints on the Type Ia supernova 2013gy
S. Holmbo, M. D. Stritzinger, B. J. Shappee, M. A. Tucker, W. Zheng,, C. Ashall, M. M. Phillips, C. Contreras, A. V. Filippenko, P. Hoeflich, M., Huber, X. F. Wang, J.-J. Zhang, J. Anais, E. Baron, C. R. Burns, A., Campillay, S. Castellon, C. Corco, E. Y. Hsiao, K. Krisciunas

TL;DR
This paper presents early observations and progenitor constraints for SN 2013gy, a normal Type Ia supernova, including its explosion time, companion size limits, and hydrogen mass constraints, enhancing understanding of supernova progenitors.
Contribution
The study provides the earliest detection of SN 2013gy and tight constraints on its progenitor system, including explosion timing and companion star properties, using multi-epoch photometry and nebular spectra.
Findings
Explosion occurred less than 48 hours before discovery.
Companion star radius constrained to ≤ 4 solar radii.
Hydrogen mass stripped from companion limited to < 0.018 solar masses.
Abstract
We present an early-phase -band light curve and visual-wavelength spectra of the normal Type Ia supernova (SN) 2013gy. The light curve is constructed by determining the appropriate S-corrections to transform KAIT natural-system - and -band photometry and Carnegie Supernova Project natural-system -band photometry to the Pan-STARRS1 -band natural photometric system. A Markov Chain Monte Carlo calculation provides a best-fit single power-law function to the first ten epochs of photometry described by an exponent of and a time of first light of MJD 56629.4, which is days (i.e., ~hr) before the discovery date (2013 December 4.84 UT) and days before the time of -band maximum (MJD 56648.5). The estimate of the time of first light is consistent with the explosion time inferred…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
