TL;DR
This paper evaluates two mitigation schemes, PCA and halo-model, for baryonic effects in weak lensing surveys, demonstrating that PCA with noise accounting effectively reduces biases and preserves constraints across various baryonic physics scenarios.
Contribution
The study compares PCA and halo-model methods for baryonic mitigation, introducing an improved PCA approach that accounts for data noise, enhancing bias removal and constraint retention.
Findings
Both methods remove biases at 000 scale cut.
PCA causes less constraint degradation than HMcode.
Improved PCA retains more information while mitigating baryonic effects.
Abstract
Modifications of the matter power spectrum due to baryonic physics are one of the major theoretical uncertainties in cosmological weak lensing measurements. Developing robust mitigation schemes for this source of systematic uncertainty increases the robustness of cosmological constraints, and may increase their precision if they enable the use of information from smaller scales. Here we explore the performance of two mitigation schemes for baryonic effects in weak lensing cosmic shear: the PCA method and the halo-model approach in \textsc{HMcode}. We construct mock tomographic shear power spectra from four hydrodynamical simulations, and run simulated likelihood analyses with \textsc{CosmoLike} assuming LSST-like survey statistics. With an angular scale cut of , both methods successfully remove the biases in cosmological parameters due to the various baryonic…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
