The physics of the Applegate mechanism: Eclipsing time variations from magnetic activity
M. V\"olschow, D. R. G. Schleicher, R. Banerjee, J. H. M. M., Schmitt

TL;DR
This paper provides a detailed physical analysis of the Applegate mechanism, showing it likely cannot explain observed eclipse timing variations in most close binary systems, especially RS-CVn types, but may be relevant for certain low-mass PCEBs.
Contribution
It introduces the most detailed model to date for the Applegate mechanism, incorporating kinetic and magnetic fluctuations to assess its viability in explaining timing variations.
Findings
Binary period variations are 10-100 times lower than observed in RS-CVn systems.
The mechanism is more plausible in low-mass post-common-envelope binaries with specific parameters.
Supports previous conclusions that the Applegate mechanism alone cannot explain all observed timing variations.
Abstract
Since its proposal in 1992, the Applegate mechanism has been discussed as a potential intrinsical mechanism to explain transit timing variations in various kinds of close binary systems. Most analytical arguments presented so far focused on the energetic feasibility of the mechanism, while applying rather crude one- or two-zone prescriptions to describe the exchange of angular momentum within the star. In this paper, we present the most detailed approach to date to describe the physics giving rise to the modulation period from kinetic and magnetic fluctuations. Assuming moderate levels of stellar parameter fluctuations, we find that the resulting binary period variations are one or two orders of magnitude lower than the observed values in RS-CVn like systems, supporting the conclusion of existing theoretical work that the Applegate mechanism may not suffice to produce the observed…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
