The High Cadence Transient Survey (HITS): Compilation and characterization of light-curve catalogs
Jorge Mart\'inez-Palomera, Francisco F\"orster, Pavlos Protopapas,, Juan Carlos Maureira, Paulina Lira, Guillermo Cabrera-Vives, Pablo Huijse,, Lluis Galbany, Thomas de Jaeger, Santiago Gonz\'alez-Gait\'an, Gustavo, Medina, Giuliano Pignata, Jaime San Mart\'in, Mario Hamuy

TL;DR
The High Cadence Transient Survey (HiTS) systematically catalogs and classifies millions of transient objects using advanced data science techniques, achieving high accuracy in identifying variable and periodic sources from large-scale, high-cadence observations.
Contribution
This work introduces a comprehensive data science pipeline for large-scale transient classification, including a hierarchical Random Forest model with high accuracy, applied to the first HiTS data release.
Findings
Cataloged ~15 million object detections and ~2.5 million classified light-curves.
Achieved ~97% accuracy in classifying variable sources.
Discovered various periodic and non-periodic transient objects, including eclipsing binaries, RR-Lyrae, QSOs, and supernova candidates.
Abstract
The High Cadence Transient Survey (HiTS) aims to discover and study transient objects with characteristic timescales between hours and days, such as pulsating, eclipsing and exploding stars. This survey represents a unique laboratory to explore large etendue observations from cadences of about 0.1 days and to test new computational tools for the analysis of large data. This work follows a fully \textit{Data Science} approach: from the raw data to the analysis and classification of variable sources. We compile a catalog of million object detections and a catalog of million light-curves classified by variability. The typical depth of the survey is , , and in , , and bands, respectively. We classified all point-like non-moving sources by first extracting features from their light-curves and then applying a Random Forest…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
