Early- and late-stage mergers among main sequence and starburst galaxies at 0.2<z<2
A. Cibinel, E. Daddi, M. T. Sargent, E. Le Floc'h, D. Liu, F., Bournaud, P. A. Oesch, P. Amram, A. Calabro', P.-A. Duc, M. Pannella, A., Puglisi, V. Perret, D. Elbaz, and V. Kokorev

TL;DR
This study reveals that the fraction of galaxy mergers increases significantly above the star-forming main sequence, especially at higher redshifts, and that major mergers are closely linked to starburst events across cosmic time.
Contribution
It introduces a non-parametric morphological classification on stellar mass maps to accurately identify mergers, reducing contamination from clumpy high-redshift galaxies, and analyzes merger fractions across redshifts and star formation activity.
Findings
Merger fraction exceeds 70% above the main sequence at z≥1.
Major mergers occur with 5-10% frequency on the main sequence across masses.
The merger fraction increases from z=0.2 to z=2, driven mainly by morphological mergers.
Abstract
We investigate the fraction of close pairs and morphologically identified mergers on and above the star-forming main sequence (MS) at 0.22.0. The novelty of our work lies in the use of a non-parametric morphological classification performed on resolved stellar mass maps, reducing the contamination by non-interacting, high-redshift clumpy galaxies. We find that the merger fraction rapidly rises to 70% above the MS, implying that -- already at -- starburst (SB) events (0.6) are almost always associated with a major merger (1:1 to 1:6 mass ratio). The majority of interacting galaxies in the SB region are morphologically disturbed, late-stage mergers. Pair fractions show little dependence on MS-offset and pairs are more prevalent than late-stage mergers only in the lower half of the MS. In our sample, major mergers on the MS occur with a…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
