A search for hypercompact HII regions in the Galactic Plane
A.Y. Yang, M. A. Thompson, W.W. Tian, S. Bihr, H. Beuther, L. Hindson

TL;DR
This study conducted the largest unbiased search for hypercompact HII regions in the Galactic Plane, revealing that current definitions may be inadequate and that many ultracompact HII regions exhibit positive spectral indices, indicating a mix of optical depths.
Contribution
It challenges the canonical definition of hypercompact HII regions and highlights the prevalence of positive spectral indices among ultracompact HII regions, suggesting a need for revised classification criteria.
Findings
None of the identified HII regions meet the canonical HCHII definition at 5 GHz.
About half of ultracompact HII regions have positive spectral indices, indicating mixed optical depths.
Positive spectrum HII regions are more luminous and associated with more massive stars.
Abstract
We have carried out the largest and most unbiased search for hypercompact (HC) HII regions. Our method combines four interferometric radio continuum surveys (THOR, CORNISH, MAGPIS and White2005) with far-infrared and sub-mm Galactic Plane surveys to identify embedded HII regions with positive spectral indices. 120 positive spectrum HII regions have been identified from a total sample of 534 positive spectral index radio sources. None of these HII regions, including the known HCHII regions recovered in our search, fulfills the canonical definition of an HCHII region at 5 GHz. We suggest that the current canonical definition of HCHII regions is not accurate and should be revised to include a hierarchical structure of ionized gas that results in an extended morphology at 5 GHz. Correlating our search with known ultracompact (UC) HII region surveys, we find that roughly half of detected…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
