Matching Estimators for Causal Effects of Multiple Treatments
Anthony D. Scotina, Francesca L. Beaudoin, Roee Gutman

TL;DR
This paper introduces a nearest-neighbors matching estimator tailored for multiple treatments, demonstrating its effectiveness through simulations and real-world application to medication effects on pain.
Contribution
It proposes a novel matching estimator for multiple treatments and provides inference methods validated via simulations and a practical case study.
Findings
Estimator is precise with coverage close to nominal levels.
Simulation results support the estimator's reliability.
Application reveals differences in medication effects on pain.
Abstract
Matching estimators for average treatment effects are widely used in the binary treatment setting, in which missing potential outcomes are imputed as the average of observed outcomes of all matches for each unit. With more than two treatment groups, however, estimation using matching requires additional techniques. In this paper, we propose a nearest-neighbors matching estimator for use with multiple, nominal treatments, and use simulations to show that this method is precise and has coverage levels that are close to nominal. In addition, we implement the proposed inference methods to examine the effects of different medication regimens on long-term pain for patients experiencing motor vehicle collision.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
