Neutron-antineutron oscillations from lattice QCD
Enrico Rinaldi, Sergey Syritsyn, Michael L. Wagman, Michael, I. Buchoff, Chris Schroeder, Joseph Wasem

TL;DR
This paper provides first-principles lattice QCD calculations of neutron-antineutron oscillation matrix elements, improving the connection between experimental measurements and BSM theories of baryon number violation, with implications for baryogenesis models.
Contribution
It presents the first lattice QCD determination of neutron-antineutron matrix elements with controlled systematic uncertainties, enhancing the accuracy of BSM constraints from oscillation experiments.
Findings
Quantum chromodynamics predicts at least ten times more oscillation events than previous models.
Systematic uncertainties are controlled using advanced lattice techniques and nonperturbative renormalization.
Results suggest stronger experimental bounds on baryon number violation than earlier estimates.
Abstract
Fundamental symmetry tests of baryon number violation in low-energy experiments can probe beyond the Standard Model (BSM) explanations of the matter-antimatter asymmetry of the universe. Neutron-antineutron oscillations are predicted to be a signature of many baryogenesis mechanisms involving low-scale baryon number violation. This work presents first-principles calculations of neutron-antineutron matrix elements needed to accurately connect measurements of the neutron-antineutron oscillation rate to constraints on baryon number violation in BSM theories. Several important systematic uncertainties are controlled by using a state-of-the-art lattice gauge field ensemble with physical quark masses and approximate chiral symmetry, performing nonperturbative renormalization with perturbative matching to the scheme, and studying excited state effects in…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
