On gravastar formation: What can be the evidence of a black hole?
Ken-ichi Nakao, Chul-Moon Yoo, Tomohiro Harada

TL;DR
This paper explores the possibility that what appears as black holes might actually be gravastars, discussing observational challenges and theoretical scenarios where black hole formation could be prevented, especially if energy conditions are violated.
Contribution
It proposes a scenario where the final state of gravitational collapse is a gravastar instead of a black hole, challenging the traditional interpretation of black hole observations.
Findings
Physical signals around collapsing objects mimic black holes.
Formation of gravastars could be indistinguishable from black holes observationally.
Such scenarios require significant violation of energy conditions.
Abstract
Any observer outside black holes cannot detect any physical signal produced by the black holes themselves, since, by definition, the black holes are not located in the causal past of the outside observer. In fact, what we regard as black hole candidates in our view are not black holes but will be gravitationally contracting objects. As well known, a black hole will form by a gravitationally collapsing object in the infinite future in the views of distant observers like us. At the very late stage of the gravitational collapse, the gravitationally contracting object behaves as a black body due to its gravity. Due to this behavior, the physical signals produced around it (e.g. the quasi-normal ringings and the shadow image) will be very similar to those caused in the eternal black hole spacetime. However those physical signals do not necessarily imply the formation of a black hole in the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
