Assessment of critical thinking in physics labs
Cole Walsh, Katherine N. Quinn, N. G. Holmes

TL;DR
This paper introduces the Physics Lab Inventory of Critical Thinking (PLIC), a validated assessment tool designed to measure and improve students' critical thinking skills in physics laboratory courses.
Contribution
The paper presents the development and validation of the PLIC, addressing a gap in diagnostic assessments for physics labs and evaluating lab design impacts on student skills.
Findings
PLIC shows strong statistical and expert validation.
Lab design influences student critical thinking performance.
PLIC effectively assesses skills in data interpretation and modeling.
Abstract
Despite the significant amount of time undergraduate students spend in introductory physics labs, there is little consensus on instructional goals and accepted diagnostic assessments for these labs. In response to these issues, we have developed the Physics Lab Inventory of Critical thinking (PLIC) to assess students' proficiency with critical thinking in a physics lab context. Specifically, the PLIC aims to evaluate students' skills in making sense of data, variability, models, and experimental methods and to assess the effectiveness of lab courses at developing these skills. Here, we discuss the statistical and expert validation of this instrument using 2681 valid student responses collected from 12 institutions during the 2017-2018 academic year. As a part of our validation, we address the impact of lab design on student performance on the instrument.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsEducation and Critical Thinking Development
