There are no Cube-free Descartes Numbers with Exactly Seven Distinct Prime Factors
Pratik Rathore

TL;DR
This paper proves that no cube-free Descartes number exists with exactly seven distinct prime factors, extending previous results that limited such numbers to fewer prime factors.
Contribution
The authors extend existing methods to demonstrate the non-existence of cube-free Descartes numbers with seven distinct prime factors.
Findings
No cube-free Descartes number with exactly seven distinct prime factors exists.
The proof builds on and extends methods from prior work by Banks et al.
The unique known Descartes number remains the only one with fewer than seven prime factors.
Abstract
We call an odd positive integer a if there exist positive integers such that and \begin{equation} \sigma(k)(m+1) = 2km \end{equation} Currently, is the only known Descartes number. In , Banks et al. proved that is the only cube-free Descartes number with fewer than seven distinct prime factors. In the present paper, we extend the methods of Banks et al. to show that there is no cube-free Descartes number with seven distinct prime factors.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAnalytic Number Theory Research · Pain Management and Placebo Effect · History and Theory of Mathematics
