Modal Logic With Non-deterministic Semantics: Part I - Propositional Case
Marcelo E. Coniglio, Luis Fari\~nas del Cerro, and Newton M. Peron

TL;DR
This paper introduces weaker non-deterministic modal logic systems with eight values, proves their completeness, and demonstrates that finite deterministic matrices cannot characterize these systems.
Contribution
It extends Ivlev's non-deterministic semantics for modal logic by proposing weaker eight-valued systems and establishing their completeness, while also showing limitations of finite deterministic matrices.
Findings
Proposed new eight-valued modal logic systems.
Proved completeness of these systems.
Showed finite deterministic matrices cannot characterize these systems.
Abstract
In 1988, Ivlev proposed four-valued non-deterministic semantics for modal logics in which the alethic T axiom holds good. Unfortunately, no completeness was proved. In previous work, we proved completeness for some Ivlev systems and extended his hierarchy, proposing weaker six-valued systems in which the T axiom was replaced by the deontic D axiom. Here, we eliminate both axioms, proposing even weaker systems with eight values. Besides, we prove completeness for those new systems. It is natural to ask if a characterization by finite ordinary (deterministic) logical matrices would be possible for all those systems. We will show that finite deterministic matrices do not characterize any of them.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
