Hundness versus Mottness in a three-band Hubbard-Hund model: On the origin of strong correlations in Hund metals
Katharina M. Stadler, Gabriel Kotliar, Andreas Weichselbaum, Jan von, Delft

TL;DR
This paper investigates the origins of strong correlations in Hund metals, demonstrating that Hundness, rather than Mottness, primarily drives the bad metallic behavior and low quasiparticle weight in a three-band Hubbard-Hund model.
Contribution
It provides a detailed phase diagram analysis showing Hundness as the main source of strong correlations, emphasizing spin-orbital separation and the role of Hund's coupling.
Findings
Hund metal behavior occurs near n_d=2 with moderate U and sizeable J.
Spin-orbital separation is a generic J-induced feature in the metallic regime.
Hundness leads to large, unscreened spins causing strong correlations without proximity to a Mott transition.
Abstract
Hund metals are multi-orbital systems with moderate Coulomb interaction, , and sizeable Hund's rule coupling, , that aligns the spins in different orbitals. They show strong correlation effects, like very low Fermi-liquid coherence scales and intriguing incoherent transport regimes, resulting in bad metallic behavior. But to what extent are these strong correlations governed by Mottness, i.e. the blocking of charge fluctuations close to a Mott insulator transition (MIT) induced by , or by Hundness, a new route towards strong correlations induced by ? To answer this question, we study the full phase diagram of a degenerate three-band Hubbard-Hund model on a Bethe lattice at zero temperature using single-site DMFT and the numerical renormalization group as efficient real-frequency multi-band impurity solver. Hund metal behavior occurs in this minimal model for a filling…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
