Remarks on Fixed Point Assertions in Digital Topology, 2
Laurence Boxer

TL;DR
This paper critically examines fixed point theorems in digital topology, highlighting that many recent results obtained by mimicking classical topology tools are often incorrect, trivial, or limited in scope.
Contribution
It provides a critical analysis showing the limitations and inaccuracies of applying classical topology methods to digital topology fixed point results.
Findings
Many recent fixed point results are incorrect or trivial
Classical topology tools may not be suitable for digital topology
The paper clarifies limitations in current digital topology fixed point research
Abstract
Several recent papers in digital topology have sought to obtain fixed point results by mimicking the use of tools from classical topology, such as complete metric spaces. We show that in many cases, researchers using these tools have derived conclusions that are incorrect, trivial, or limited.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsDigital Image Processing Techniques · Computational Geometry and Mesh Generation
