Definable retractions and a non-Archimedean Tietze--Urysohn theorem over Henselian valued fields
Krzysztof Jan Nowak

TL;DR
This paper establishes the existence of definable retractions in Henselian valued fields, leading to non-Archimedean analogues of classical theorems on extending continuous functions, using tools like resolution of singularities.
Contribution
It introduces a method to construct definable retractions onto closed sets in Henselian valued fields, enabling non-Archimedean versions of the Tietze--Urysohn and Dugundji theorems.
Findings
Existence of definable retractions onto closed subsets in Henselian valued fields.
Non-Archimedean analogues of classical extension theorems established.
Utilization of resolution of singularities and closedness theorem in proofs.
Abstract
We prove the existence of definable retractions onto arbitrary closed subsets of definable over Henselian valued fields . Hence directly follows non-Archimedian analogues of the Tietze--Urysohn and Dugundji theorems on extending continuous definable functions. The main ingredients of the proof are a description of definable sets due to van den Dries, resolution of singularities and our closedness theorem.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Topology and Set Theory · Mathematical and Theoretical Analysis · Rings, Modules, and Algebras
