Leakage and dephasing in $^{28}$Si-based exchange-only spin qubits
Arnau Sala, Jeroen Danon

TL;DR
This paper investigates leakage and dephasing mechanisms in $^{28}$Si-based exchange-only spin qubits, identifying how spin-orbit interactions and electrical noise affect qubit coherence and relaxation, with implications for optimizing qubit operation.
Contribution
It provides a detailed analysis of spin-orbit-mediated leakage rates and the impact of electrical noise at the sweet spot in $^{28}$Si spin qubits, revealing power-law dependencies and decay behaviors.
Findings
Leakage rates depend on magnetic field as B^5 to B^{11}.
Electrical noise causes a power-law decay of qubit coherence, not exponential.
The sweet spot minimizes leakage and decoherence effects.
Abstract
Exchange-only spin qubits hosted in Si-based triple quantum dots do not suffer from decoherence caused by randomly fluctuating nuclear-spin ensembles and can be relatively robust against electrical noise when operated at a sweet spot. Remaining sources of decoherence are qubit relaxation, leakage out of the qubit subspace, and dephasing due to residual effects of charge noise, the latter two of which are the focus of this work. We investigate spin-orbit-mediated leakage rates to the three-spin ground state accompanied by virtual (i) tunneling, (ii) orbital excitation, and (iii) valley excitation of an electron. We find different power-law dependencies on the applied magnetic field for the three mechanisms as well as for the two leakage rates, ranging from to , and identify the sweet spot as a point of minimal leakage. We also revisit the role of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
