Nash Equilibrium and Bisimulation Invariance
Julian Gutierrez, Paul Harrenstein, Giuseppe Perelli, Michael, Wooldridge

TL;DR
This paper investigates how bisimilarity affects Nash equilibria in concurrent games, revealing that standard models do not preserve equilibrium existence under behavioral equivalence, and proposes alternative strategy models that do.
Contribution
The paper identifies the non-preservation of Nash equilibria under bisimilarity in standard models and introduces new strategy models that ensure preservation, enhancing the semantic foundations of strategic logics.
Findings
Bisimilarity does not preserve Nash equilibria in standard strategy models.
Alternative strategy models can ensure equilibrium preservation under bisimilarity.
New semantic frameworks for strategic reasoning are proposed.
Abstract
Game theory provides a well-established framework for the analysis of concurrent and multi-agent systems. The basic idea is that concurrent processes (agents) can be understood as corresponding to players in a game; plays represent the possible computation runs of the system; and strategies define the behaviour of agents. Typically, strategies are modelled as functions from sequences of system states to player actions. Analysing a system in such a setting involves computing the set of (Nash) equilibria in the concurrent game. However, we show that, with respect to the above model of strategies (arguably, the "standard" model in the computer science literature), bisimilarity does not preserve the existence of Nash equilibria. Thus, two concurrent games which are behaviourally equivalent from a semantic perspective, and which from a logical perspective satisfy the same temporal logic…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsLogic, Reasoning, and Knowledge · Game Theory and Applications · Logic, programming, and type systems
