TL;DR
This paper shows that current short baseline reactor experiments like Daya Bay and RENO can set significant upper bounds on the neutrino mass-squared difference $m^2_{21}$, providing a new consistency check for neutrino oscillation models.
Contribution
It introduces a novel method to constrain $m^2_{21}$ using existing data from Daya Bay and RENO, covering a different $L/E$ range for validation.
Findings
Daya Bay and RENO can place upper bounds on $m^2_{21}$.
Current data provides important constraints before JUNO's precise measurement.
The approach offers an independent consistency check for the three-flavor neutrino paradigm.
Abstract
We demonstrate that the currently running short baseline reactor experiments, especially Daya Bay, can put a significant upper bound on . This novel approach to determining can be performed with the current data of both Daya Bay \& RENO and provides additional information on in a different range ( 0.5 km/MeV) for an important consistency check on the 3 flavor massive neutrino paradigm. Upper limits by Daya Bay and RENO and a possible lower limit from Daya Bay, before the end of 2020, will be the only new information on this important quantity until the medium baseline reactor experiment, JUNO, gives a very precise measurement in the middle of the next decade. In this study value is fixed since its impact on the measurement is relatively small as discussed in the Appendix.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
