Binary additive MRD codes with minimum distance n-1 must contain a semifield spread set
John Sheekey

TL;DR
This paper proves that certain additive MRD codes over GF(2) with minimum distance n-1 must include a semifield spread set, and classifies these codes for small n and over GF(3) using computational methods.
Contribution
It establishes a structural result linking additive MRD codes to semifield spread sets and provides a classification for small parameters both theoretically and computationally.
Findings
Additive MRD codes with minimum distance n-1 contain semifield spread sets in some cases.
Complete classifications of such codes for n ≤ 6 over GF(2) and in M_4(GF(3)).
MRD codes with minimum distance n-1 are rarer than those with distance n.
Abstract
In this paper we prove a result on the structure of the elements of an additive {\it maximum rank distance (MRD) code} over the field of order two, namely that in some cases such codes must contain a semifield spread set. We use this result to classify additive MRD codes in with minimum distance for . Furthermore we present a computational classification of additive MRD codes in . The computational evidence indicates that MRD codes of minimum distance are much more rare than MRD codes of minimum distance , i.e. semifield spread sets. In all considered cases, each equivalence class has a known algebraic construction.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCoding theory and cryptography · Cooperative Communication and Network Coding · graph theory and CDMA systems
