Detectability of biosignatures in anoxic atmospheres with the James Webb Space Telescope: A TRAPPIST-1e case study
Joshua Krissansen-Totton, Ryan Garland, Patrick Irwin, and David C., Catling

TL;DR
This study assesses JWST's ability to detect biosignatures like methane and carbon dioxide in anoxic exoplanet atmospheres, focusing on TRAPPIST-1e, and finds that a limited number of transits could reveal signs of life.
Contribution
It demonstrates that JWST can potentially detect biosignatures in anoxic atmospheres through transit spectroscopy, emphasizing methane and carbon dioxide detection in a case study of TRAPPIST-1e.
Findings
Approximately 10 transits may suffice to detect CO2 and constrain CH4.
Detection of biosignatures is robust against clouds and noise assumptions.
Upper limits on CO could help distinguish biological from non-biological methane sources.
Abstract
The James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) may be capable of finding biogenic gases in the atmospheres of habitable exoplanets around low mass stars. Considerable attention has been given to the detectability of biogenic oxygen, which could be found using an ozone proxy, but ozone detection with JWST will be extremely challenging, even for the most favorable targets. Here, we investigate the detectability of biosignatures in anoxic atmospheres analogous to those that likely existed on the early Earth. Arguably, such anoxic biosignatures could be more prevalent than oxygen biosignatures if life exists elsewhere. Specifically, we simulate JWST retrievals of TRAPPIST-1e to determine whether the methane plus carbon dioxide disequilibrium biosignature pair is detectable in transit transmission. We find that ~10 transits using the Near InfraRed Spectrograph (NIRSpec) prism instrument may be…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
