Optimal conditions for Bell test using spontaneous parametric down-conversion sources
Yoshiaki Tsujimoto, Kentaro Wakui, Mikio Fujiwara, Kazuhiro Hayasaka,, Shigehito Miki, Hirotaka Terai, Masahide Sasaki, Masahiro Takeoka

TL;DR
This paper investigates the optimal conditions for Bell tests using SPDC sources, showing that a higher average photon number enhances CHSH violation and proposing a method to estimate ideal Bell values from lossy data.
Contribution
It combines theoretical analysis and experimental validation to identify optimal SPDC parameters for Bell tests and introduces a novel method to estimate ideal Bell violations from imperfect data.
Findings
Optimal photon number for maximum CHSH violation is around 0.5.
Experimental results align with theoretical predictions despite detection inefficiencies.
A new method estimates ideal Bell violation values from lossy experimental data.
Abstract
We theoretically and experimentally investigate the optimal conditions for the Bell experiment using spontaneous parametric down conversion (SPDC) sources. In theory, we show that relatively large average photon number (typically 0.5) is desirable to observe the maximum violation of the Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt (CHSH) inequality. In experiment, we perform the Bell experiment without postselection using polarization entangled photon pairs at 1550 nm telecommunication wavelength generated from SPDC sources. While the violation of the CHSH inequality is not directly observed due to the overall detection efficiencies of our system, the experimental values agree well with those obtained by the theory with experimental imperfections. Furthermore, in the range of the small average photon numbers (), we propose and demonstrate a method to estimate the ideal CHSH value…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
