Exploring Bayesian parameter estimation for chiral effective field theory using nucleon-nucleon phase shifts
S. Wesolowski, R. J. Furnstahl, J. A. Melendez, D. R. Phillips

TL;DR
This paper applies a Bayesian framework to estimate parameters in chiral effective field theory for nucleon-nucleon interactions, revealing degeneracies and stability issues in low-energy constants with respect to data and higher-order corrections.
Contribution
It introduces a Bayesian approach to parameter estimation in chiral EFT, highlighting the importance of including higher-order uncertainties and analyzing parameter degeneracies.
Findings
Degeneracy in fourth-order LECs due to on-shell vanishing operators
Parameter estimates are stable when truncation errors are properly modeled
Comparison of uncorrelated and correlated error models suggests Gaussian processes for future work
Abstract
We recently developed a Bayesian framework for parameter estimation in general effective field theories. Here we present selected results from using that framework to estimate parameters with a nucleon-nucleon (NN) potential derived using chiral effective field theory (EFT): the semi-local NN potential of Epelbaum, Krebs, and Mei{\ss}ner (EKM). There are many NN scattering data, up to high energies, and with rather small errors, so imposing a penalty for unnatural low-energy constants (LECs) usually has a small effect on the fits. In contrast, we have found that including an estimate of higher orders in EFT plays an important role in robust parameter estimation.We present two case studies where our Bayesian machinery illuminates physics issues. The first involves the EKM potential at fourth order in the EFT expansion: the two-dimensional posterior probability density…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
