On the space density of X-ray selected cataclysmic variables
A. Schwope

TL;DR
This study refines the estimates of how common different types of X-ray selected cataclysmic variables are in space by using Gaia parallaxes, revealing they are rarer than previously thought, with implications for future surveys.
Contribution
It provides updated, more accurate space density estimates of X-ray selected CVs using Gaia data, improving upon previous constraints and highlighting the need for larger samples.
Findings
CVs are rarer than previously estimated.
Most IP distances were underestimated before.
Upper limits on space densities are established.
Abstract
The space density of the various classes of cataclysmic variables (CVs) could only be weakly constrained in the past. Reasons were the small number of objects in complete X-ray flux-limited samples and the difficulty to derive precise distances to CVs. The former limitation still exists. Here the impact of Gaia parallaxes and implied distances on the space density of X-ray selected complete, flux-limited samples is studied. The samples are described in the literature, those of non-magnetic CVs are based on ROSAT (RBS - ROSAT Bright Survey & NEP -- North Ecliptic Pole), that of the Intermediate Polars stems from Swift/BAT. All CVs appear to be rarer than previously thought, although the new values are all within the errors of past studies. Upper limits at 90\% confidence for the space densities of non-magnetic CVs are pc, and $\rho_{\rm…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
