Constraining the parameters of GW150914 & GW170104 with numerical relativity surrogates
Prayush Kumar, Jonathan Blackman, Scott E. Field, Mark Scheel, Chad R., Galley, Michael Boyle, Lawrence E. Kidder, Harald P. Pfeiffer, Bela Szilagyi,, Saul A. Teukolsky

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that numerical relativity surrogate models can improve gravitational wave parameter estimation by extracting additional information from GW data, leading to more accurate source properties for black hole mergers.
Contribution
The paper introduces the use of high-accuracy NR surrogate models for parameter estimation of GW events, showing they outperform traditional models in extracting sub-dominant mode information.
Findings
NR surrogates reliably estimate source parameters
Refined analysis increases estimated distance by 20-25%
Better constrains orbital orientation and spins
Abstract
Gravitational-wave detectors have begun to observe coalescences of heavy black holes at a consistent pace for the past few years. Accurate models of gravitational waveforms are essential for unbiased and precise estimation of source parameters. Recently developed surrogate models based on high-accuracy numerical relativity (NR) simulations are ideal for constraining physical parameters of heavy black hole merger events. In this paper, we first demonstrate the viability of these multi-modal surrogates as reliable parameter estimation tools. We show that NR surrogates can extract additional information from GW data that is inaccessible to traditional models, by analyzing a set of synthetic signals with the NR surrogate and other approximants. We also consider the case of two of the earliest binary black holes detected by the LIGO observatories: GW150914 and GW170104. We reanalyze their…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
