Rethinking Image Sensor Noise for Forensic Advantage
Richard Matthews, Matthew Sorell, Nickolas Falkner

TL;DR
This paper reexamines sensor pattern noise in images, revealing additional noise sources beyond traditional models, and proposes a unified approach to improve forensic image provenance analysis with fewer resources.
Contribution
It introduces a comprehensive noise analysis that incorporates multiple noise sources, enhancing fingerprint extraction methods for forensic purposes.
Findings
Additional noise sources can be identified within the noise residue.
A unified noise model improves fingerprinting efficiency.
Fewer resources are needed for comparable forensic performance.
Abstract
Sensor pattern noise has been found to be a reliable tool for providing information relating to the provenance of an image. Conventionally sensor pattern noise is modelled as a mutual interaction of pixel non-uniformity noise and dark current. By using a wavelet denoising filter it is possible to isolate a unique signal within a sensor caused by the way the silicon reacts non-uniformly to light. This signal is often referred to as a fingerprint. To obtain the estimate of this photo response non-uniformity multiple sample images are averaged and filtered to derive a noise residue. This process and model, while useful at providing insight into an images provenance, fails to take into account additional sources of noise that are obtained during this process. These other sources of noise include digital processing artefacts collectively known as camera noise, image compression artefacts,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsDigital Media Forensic Detection · Image Processing Techniques and Applications · Cell Image Analysis Techniques
