Comparing seven variants of the Ensemble Kalman Filter: How many synthetic experiments are needed?
Johannes Keller, Harrie-Jan Hendricks Franssen, Gabriele Marquart

TL;DR
This study evaluates how many synthetic experiments are necessary to reliably compare the performance of seven Ensemble Kalman Filter variants across different ensemble sizes and model setups.
Contribution
It provides a systematic analysis of the number of synthetic experiments needed for robust performance comparison of EnKF variants in geoscience applications.
Findings
10 synthetic experiments suffice to distinguish RMSE differences >10%
100 experiments needed to detect RMSE differences <2% for certain ensemble sizes
EnKF variant rankings depend on model setup and ensemble size
Abstract
The Ensemble Kalman Filter (EnKF) is a popular estimation technique in the geosciences. It is used as a numerical tool for state vector prognosis and parameter estimation. The EnKF can, for example, help to evaluate the geothermal potential of an aquifer. In such applications, the EnKF is often used with small or medium ensemble sizes. It is therefore of interest to characterize the EnKF behavior for these ensemble sizes. For seven ensemble sizes (50, 70, 100, 250, 500, 1000, 2000) and seven EnKF-variants (Damped, Iterative, Local, Hybrid, Dual, Normal Score and Classical EnKF), we computed 1000 synthetic parameter estimation experiments for two set-ups: a 2D tracer transport problem and a 2D flow problem with one injection well. For each model, the only difference among synthetic experiments was the generated set of random permeability fields. The 1000 synthetic experiments allow to…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
