Robust Counterfactual Inferences using Feature Learning and their Applications
Abhimanyu Mitra, Kannan Achan, Sushant Kumar

TL;DR
This paper introduces a feature learning algorithm that enhances counterfactual inference by identifying subpopulations where interventions are most or least effective, enabling more personalized decision-making.
Contribution
The novel algorithm learns from randomized experiments to identify subpopulations with significant differences, improving personalized intervention strategies.
Findings
Effective in identifying subpopulations with significant feedback differences
Enhances decision-making for future interventions based on learned features
Demonstrates improved personalization in intervention applications
Abstract
In a wide variety of applications, including personalization, we want to measure the difference in outcome due to an intervention and thus have to deal with counterfactual inference. The feedback from a customer in any of these situations is only 'bandit feedback' - that is, a partial feedback based on whether we chose to intervene or not. Typically randomized experiments are carried out to understand whether an intervention is overall better than no intervention. Here we present a feature learning algorithm to learn from a randomized experiment where the intervention in consideration is most effective and where it is least effective rather than only focusing on the overall impact, thus adding a context to our learning mechanism and extract more information. From the randomized experiment, we learn the feature representations which divide the population into subpopulations where we…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Bandit Algorithms Research · Advanced Causal Inference Techniques · Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
