Three Efficient, Low-Complexity Algorithms for Automatic Color Trapping

TL;DR

This paper introduces three low-complexity, hardware-friendly algorithms for automatic color trapping to reduce misregistration artifacts in printing, suitable for embedded firmware and software implementations.

Contribution

It presents three novel algorithms that efficiently perform color trapping with low storage and computational requirements, improving upon previous methods.

Findings

All three algorithms effectively correct small misregistration errors.

The algorithms require significantly less storage than previous methods.

They are suitable for embedded and host-based printer software.

Abstract

Color separations (most often cyan, magenta, yellow, and black) are commonly used in printing to reproduce multi-color images. For mechanical reasons, these color separations are generally not perfectly aligned with respect to each other when they are rendered by their respective imaging stations. This phenomenon, called color plane misregistration, causes gap and halo artifacts in the printed image. Color trapping is an image processing technique that aims to reduce these artifacts by modifying the susceptible edge boundaries to create small, unnoticeable overlaps between the color planes. We propose three low-complexity algorithms for automatic color trapping which hide the effects of small color plane mis-registrations. Our algorithms are designed for software or embedded firmware implementation. The trapping method they follow is based on a hardware-friendly technique proposed by J. Trask (JTHBCT03) which is too computationally expensive for software or firmware implementation. The first two algorithms are based on the use of look-up tables (LUTs). The first LUT-based algorithm corrects all registration errors of one pixel in extent and reduces several cases of misregistration errors of two pixels in extent using only 727 Kbytes of storage space. This algorithm is particularly attractive for implementation in the embedded firmware of low-cost formatter-based printers. The second LUT-based algorithm corrects all types of misregistration errors of up to two pixels in extent using 3.7 Mbytes of storage space. The third algorithm is a hybrid one that combines LUTs and feature extraction to minimize the storage requirements (724 Kbytes) while still correcting all misregistration errors of up to two pixels in extent. This algorithm is suitable for both embedded firmware implementation on low-cost formatter-based printers and software implementation on host-based printers.