On the mathematics of the free-choice paradigm
Peter Selinger, Kristopher Tapp

TL;DR
This paper discusses the logical issues in free-choice experiments, introduces a method for correct implementation without control groups, and advances the understanding of choice-induced attitude change measurement.
Contribution
It presents a new method for conducting free-choice experiments accurately without relying on control groups, addressing previous logical flaws.
Findings
Identified logical flaws in past free-choice experiments
Proposed a novel method for experiment design without control groups
Enhances validity of choice-induced attitude change measurement
Abstract
Chen and Risen pointed out a logical flaw affecting the conclusions of a number of past experiments that used the free-choice paradigm to measure choice-induced attitude change. They went on to design and implement a free-choice experiment that used a novel type of control group in order to avoid this logical pitfall. In this paper, we describe a method by which a free-choice experiment can be correctly conducted even without a control group.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSocial and Intergroup Psychology · Cultural Differences and Values · Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
