Comparison of processing-induced deformations of InP bonded to Si determined by e-beam metrology: direct vs. adhesive bonding
Aurimas Sakanas, Elizaveta Semenova, Luisa Ottaviano, Jesper M{\o}rk,, Kresten Yvind

TL;DR
This study uses electron beam metrology to compare deformation effects in InP-on-Si bonding methods, revealing how bonding and processing configurations influence alignment accuracy crucial for photonic device fabrication.
Contribution
It provides a detailed analysis of deformation sources in different bonding configurations, offering guidance to optimize fabrication processes for high-precision photonic devices.
Findings
Direct bonding with same-side patterning yields minimal deformation.
Bonding-induced deformations are significant in double-sided processing.
Mechanical wafer clamping affects multilayer alignment accuracy.
Abstract
In this paper, we employ an electron beam writer as metrology tool to investigate distortion of an exposed pattern of alignment marks in heterogeneously bonded InP on silicon. After experimental study of three different bonding and processing configurations which represent typical on-chip photonic device fabrication conditions, the smallest degree of linearly-corrected distortion errors is obtained for the directly bonded wafer, with the alignment marks both formed and measured on the same InP layer side after bonding (equivalent to single-sided processing of the bonded layer). Under these conditions, multilayer exposure alignment accuracy is limited by the InP layer deformation after the initial pattern exposure mainly due to the mechanical wafer clamping in the e-beam cassette. Bonding-induced InP layer deformations dominate in cases of direct and BCB bonding when the alignment marks…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
